Conorbirda2
Well-known member
Hi Henerz,
Which one of my posts do you find argumentative? (apart from perhaps this one.) All I have done is reluctantly respond to Paul's escalations with what I think are considered replies. Everything I have said is to the best of my knowledge, factual and true. You may not like hearing what I have said about one of your friends but it's the truth there's no argument about that. I also notice that you have not included Paul in your accusations of being argumentative and yet he is the one who has escalated my innocent question, challenged me to respond and seems intent on making it personal. If you read my posts carefully you will see that I have mostly tried to defuse the situation and avoid a public slanging match. It has been Paul who has consistantly dug himself deeper into a hole of his own making.
Dave
Dave, all you have done is have a go at the website, your posts are more sniping than argumentative, it almost sounds like jealousy?. Apart from the Goosander episode, none of what you have said relates to me personally, so what are you refering to when you say " you might not like hearing what i have said about one of your friends"?? Henerz has spent a damn sight longer in the field with me than you have and can no doubt judge for himself about me personally. And your facts about the Goosander/RB Merg numbers were neither factual or true. Much like the BH Wagtail story. You do not know me well enough personally to know if anything you have said is true? And where's the hole Im digging? Everything you have refered to was pointed out to me a long time ago and rectified. You are just raking over old ground. You also stated that "(my website) despite having very few photographs" ??? There are over three hundred in the Galleries alone. Add to that all the ones added to the Daily Bird Reports and you will find that there are probably 700+ photographs on the site. Which i dont think is bad for a website that has been running for less than two years. There are also some photos and discussion/comments about the Hume's at Tehidy. From others, not me, who also doubted Hume's. As i said, I don't claim to be an expert in Hume's.
http://www.cornwall-birding.co.uk/i...ssible-humes-leaf-warbler-at-tehidy/#comments
What i asked you to do in the first place was to point out any mistakes or oversights on the website. So far all you have done is point out mistakes that have already been pointed out and rectified, i.e. Azorean YL Gull, BH Wagtail and RB/ Common Gull. And as for sweeping statements:
"If you can’t even age a gull properly, you will have no hope of identifying it correctly."
What??!! Really? So if you can't age a Little Gull, for example, you cant identify it?
And you really shouldnt be flattered. I haven't been changing any mistakes on the website. Certainly nothing you have mentioned. Im quite happy to take constructive critisism about the website especially mistakes being pointed out but can you make them relevant, not ones that have already been rectified. Anyway, i won't be responding to anything further you have to say, as Henerz said earlier, lets get this thread back on track. Plans are in motion to make Cornwall Birding subscription only, still free but i will be able to regulate who uses it. So those who regularly use it, do not contribute but feel fit to critisize can be excluded from using the facility.
And for your info Dave, the photos of the wagtail were sent to me on the 7th may. The bird was there on the 5th May. So if they had been sent elsewhere, it wouldnt have mattered, the bird had already gone. But then there was nothing stopping you, having realized that it was not Blue-headed, going down on the 8th to look for it.
The "When did i have trouble with them in the past" comment was somewhat tongue in cheek, for you to bring up the Helston Goosander. Which you did.
As i said before, it was Mush who brought the BH Wagtail to my attention. Not you. So i havent got that wrong at all.
And i still dont know where you got the impression that I changed anything to do with the Tehidy Hume's reports?? Probably a good job you aren't a proof reader.
THE END....................................and my apologies to everyone else who uses this thread for hijacking it with this rant!!B