Jim LeNomenclatoriste
Je suis un mignon petit Traquet rubicole
I'm ironic
IronyHmm...are you serious about this?
Reasoning along the same lines, every individual has a unique DNA, so ...
I'm ironic
IronyHmm...are you serious about this?
Reasoning along the same lines, every individual has a unique DNA, so ...
Its even more complicated than that. The western hesperis subspecies has a deeper voice than the eastern subspecies, so which of those is Nat Geo comparing them to? And the south Florida crows reported to be very different vocally in both tone and repertoire.My old 2nd ed Nat Geo FG states difference is in calls that are lower and hoarser. Whether that is still the case (with pure NW Crows if any can be found) I don't know.
Niels
I've not read the paper yet, but there is a valid argument backed up by several studies that show that species boundaries can breakdown in anthropogenic habitats. There's an old study on Paradise Flycatchers that showed this IIRC and some cichlid examples too. It's a hypothesis worth exploring, however I'm not sure that the hypothesis alone is enough to overturn the lump.That is my interpretation as well. I assume he feels that there could be an argument made that the hybrid zone is narrow? Whether that is an argument I would buy? probably not, but I would need to read the entire paper to see if there is an argument.
Niels
Speaking of North American Jays...
Provides strong evidence and advocates for splitting Steller's Jay into two species, the coastal/interior Blue-fronted Jay (Cyanocitta stelleri) and the Rocky Mountain Long-crested Jay (Cyanocitta macrolopha).
They also suggest that the Central American populations might be worthy of a split (they are considered here as within Long-crested Jay, but that more information is needed before that determination can be made.
After the split of the species, how are the subspecies distributed?The subspecies diademata is usually included in the same group as macrolopha and has name priority. It is not sampled in Cicero et al. but they do mention it as part of the sspp group including macrolopha.
Morphology and biogeography would keep these sspp together, so, does anyone know the reason why Long-crested Jay is not Cyanocitta diademata?
Speaking of North American Jays...
Provides strong evidence and advocates for splitting Steller's Jay into two species, the coastal/interior Blue-fronted Jay (Cyanocitta stelleri) and the Rocky Mountain Long-crested Jay (Cyanocitta macrolopha).
I believe there is a map in the paper showing this.After the split of the species, how are the subspecies distributed?
If we are going down the rabbit hole of common names, I prefer White-fronted Jay rather than Long-crested Jay, as I think it is a more useful name (again, there is a focus on priority as if priority mattered at all with common names), and contrasts nicely with Blue-fronted. While the Long-crested is...well...longer-crested, the difference feels a bit slight compared to other differences between the two forms.I'm kind of bummed they didn't suggest Stellar Jay as the English name for one of the two daughter species, I mean they're pretty fantastic birds!
They sample 7 out of 16 Steller's Jay taxa and the results align with the sspp groups of HBW/Clements.After the split of the species, how are the subspecies distributed?
The linked paper has a number of illustrations. As the artist it would have been nice to have had an acknowledgment rather than a note saying they are from Birds of the World...They sample 7 out of 16 Steller's Jay taxa and the results align with the sspp groups of HBW/Clements.
The 7 taxa are grouped in a way which can be interpreted as:
1. Blue-fronted Jay Cyanocitta stelleri
incl. frontalis & carbonacea
2a. 'Northern' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [macrolopha] macrolopha
incl. annectens
2b. 'Central American' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [macrolopha] coronata
incl. ridgwayi
Following conventional wisdom, the unsampled sspp fit as follows:
(1) carlottae
(2a) diademata, phillipsi
(2b) purpurea, azteca, teotepecensis, restricta, lazula, suavis
The issue is the position of diademata because it has priority over macrolopha and would thus be the new species' name.
EDIT: I've just noticed that coronata also has priority over macrolopha (and diademata) - so the name Cyanocitta macrolopha is definitely wrong!
Should probably be:
1. Blue-fronted Jay Cyanocitta stelleri
2a. 'Northern' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [coronata] diademata
2b. 'Central American' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [coronata] coronata
"Long-crested" Jay seems like a truly poor name for anything containing ssp.s ridgwayi and restricta - e.g, see this picture ML20917451 Steller's Jay Macaulay Library (I had a hard time believing this was really a Steller's Jay when I saw it in Guatemala)They sample 7 out of 16 Steller's Jay taxa and the results align with the sspp groups of HBW/Clements.
The 7 taxa are grouped in a way which can be interpreted as:
1. Blue-fronted Jay Cyanocitta stelleri
incl. frontalis & carbonacea
2a. 'Northern' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [macrolopha] macrolopha
incl. annectens
2b. 'Central American' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [macrolopha] coronata
incl. ridgwayi
Following conventional wisdom, the unsampled sspp fit as follows:
(1) carlottae
(2a) diademata, phillipsi
(2b) purpurea, azteca, teotepecensis, restricta, lazula, suavis
The issue is the position of diademata because it has priority over macrolopha and would thus be the new species' name.
EDIT: I've just noticed that coronata also has priority over macrolopha (and diademata) - so the name Cyanocitta macrolopha is definitely wrong!
Should probably be:
1. Blue-fronted Jay Cyanocitta stelleri
2a. 'Northern' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [coronata] diademata
2b. 'Central American' Long-crested Jay Cyanocitta [coronata] coronata
Wow! That looks almost more like a Blue Jay with a black mask!"Long-crested" Jay seems like a truly poor name for anything containing ssp.s ridgwayi and restricta - e.g, see this picture ML20917451 Steller's Jay Macaulay Library (I had a hard time believing this was really a Steller's Jay when I saw it in Guatemala)