Andrew Rowlands
Well-known member
scampo said:Oh I don't think you would. And why the snide tone to your statement? I don't know, first Andy, now you... presuming you know what I do, and what others do. Naughty. You should try to find better rhetoric for your argument.
But, hold on a minute, you do say "we armchair critics" - are you including yourself in that group? Hmm.
Now, come on! There's never been a debate without tempers being frayed and "armchair critics" airing off. After all, we're not automatons. Interestingly, "suricate", of those who have written in, one very interesting aspect is to look at who hide behind a persona and who are more open.
Food for thought.
In case you hadn't read the reference correctly, Scampo, I too used the word WE, intending to implicate myself in the comment as well as 'unnamed' others. My comment was not intended as a personal attack. I know full well that many people that contribute to this forum work hard in the field with landowners, farmers, Foresty Commission, local government departments et al, to try to help our wildlife and countryside. There may be others who have their own selfish agenda, I don't know and can only guess.
Andy.