Operating as a OEM, Meopta's production differs from that of Swarovski, Zeiss and Leica.I believe Meopta outsources a lot of the manufacturing of their Optika and Meopro lines but I think they cut and grind glass right their in Czech Republic.
Leica clearly outsources some of their things such as the erector and turret systems in their new rifle scopes.
Why hate anybody?Don’t hate China, hate the company.
Interesting to read this. I research Alpha Brands for fun in the evening, and I keep coming back to Leica (I own a Leica camera, extremely pleased with quality even if it is the cheap, Japan outsourced model- D Lux Top 109). I am then drawn to Zeiss, but I cannot seem to take a liking to the Swaro's, even though they continuously seem to garner higher ratings. I luv the new Leica Trinovid 10x40, but wow,,, costs more than an Apple MacBook Pro! Or very close to same anyway. 12,200¥Hi dude,
Welcome to BF and thanks for your honest response.
The discussion about A brands outsourcing to China is going on for quite a while now and count two parties. The ones who don't care where it comes from as long as the product is good and the ones who won't accept a A brand that accept outsourcing (read: loose QC).
Personally I belong to the second half.
Having said all this, sample variation is the end result of poor QC and/or cutting corners during production by the OEM but also due to lack of interest (read: cheaper) of the commissioner.
AFAIK both Leica and Meopta outsource also and Swarovski doesn't.
Jan
Viper seems hard to find here... Luv the Monarch 5 (5S ?), but here it costs more than the Terra.If you want a better bin than the terra, then get the Vortex Viper HD (MIC) or Nikon Monarch 7 (I think MIC). You will be hard pressed to find a good binocular in this price range not made in China. Buy a Viper HD
Yes, when the Retrovid came out we had it taken apart to see if there was any oriental origin in it, which there apparently wasn't. Well made in Portugal by Leica which explains the high price. The HD version (like theZeiss Conquest) is from oriental origine though and for that reason cheaper.Interesting to read this. I research Alpha Brands for fun in the evening, and I keep coming back to Leica (I own a Leica camera, extremely pleased with quality even if it is the cheap, Japan outsourced model- D Lux Top 109). I am then drawn to Zeiss, but I cannot seem to take a liking to the Swaro's, even though they continuously seem to garner higher ratings. I luv the new Leica Trinovid 10x40, but wow,,, costs more than an Apple MacBook Pro! Or very close to same anyway. 12,200¥
The figures are from a YouTube review of red-dot sights, sorry can't remember the source. So whilst not exactly binoculars it gives a ball park feeling for the relative manufacturing costs.Are those real numbers from a cite-able source,or do they just sound good?
Thanks for the info. I did check-out the HD and now see why it is considerably cheaper. But uggh, it still has that 'clone' look about it.Yes, when the Retrovid came out we had it taken apart to see if there was any oriental origin in it, which there apparently wasn't. Well made in Portugal by Leica which explains the high price. The HD version (like theZeiss Conquest) is from oriental origine though and for that reason cheaper.
Jan
On a bit of a side note, may I ask why it seems the Steiner brand is never mentioned when discussing First-rate optics, let alone Alpha class? I understand them to be high-quality German made. ummm, what am I missing?
What you are missing is the fact that a Italian firearm producer bought Steiner, outsourced the production for the most part to your country, kept the prices high and "Made in Germany".On a bit of a side note, may I ask why it seems the Steiner brand is never mentioned when discussing First-rate optics, let alone Alpha class? I understand them to be high-quality German made. ummm, what am I missing?
Very interesting! Thx JanWhat you are missing is the fact that a Italian firearm producer bought Steiner, outsourced the production for the most part to your country, kept the prices high and "Made in Germany".
Jan
What you are missing is the fact that a Italian firearm producer bought Steiner, outsourced the production for the most part to your country, kept the prices high and "Made in Germany".
Jan
mTown,I am currently comparing a pair of Steiner binoculars to other binoculars.
Last time I visited the Steiner facility in Bayruth (a couple of years back) I only saw the production of Porro binoculars and asked one of the staff that was buzzie producing them where the roof prism binoculars were and the answer was: "roofprisms binoculars? We don't produce roof prism binoculars here".Sorry, but I can't let your statement stand without proof. Of course, you can assume that the majority of Steiner entry-level products are partly pre-manufactured/pre-assembled abroad/China(?). However, there are several videos (also current ones from 2018 - 2020, see Youtube) and reports/interviews where you can see how binoculars of different types are manufactured at Steiner HQ in Bayreuth/Germany (lenses ground, assembled, checked etc.). And nevertheless, all models are then finalized in Bayreuth according to Steiner's statement (whatever that may mean), see e. g. Interview with Steiner (use for example google translator for english).
I have done a little research on the subject as this interests me myself (also because I come from Germany) and I am currently comparing a pair of Steiner binoculars to other binoculars. And by the way (@diverdude1 ) if there are specific questions about the manufacturing of the binoculars, you could just ask Steiner customer service.