The EDG is long in the tooth, and Nikon won't fix them unless you ship them to Japan. Nikon used an unnecessarily heavy rubber armor on the EDG that makes them almost 5 oz. heavier and much bulkier than the MHG. Nikon wisened up when they designed the MHG because they used a lighter armor only where it is necessary, and it made the binocular considerably lighter. Don't confuse build quality with extra weight. The MHG is built every bit as good as the EDG it is just lighter. The MHG is sharper on-axis, has a much bigger 8.3 degree FOV versus the EDG's puny 7.7 degree FOV, and it is much brighter than the EDG because the transmission is higher. Nikon discontinued the EDG for a reason, it couldn't compete with the SF or NL in FOV or brightness. EDG's are also hard to sell because they are discontinued. Here is a like new one that just sold after a month on Astromart for $990.I've got 7x42 and 8x42 binos, and 7x35 as well....not to worry, there's plenty of room for both. IMO 42mm EDG is SO much better than MHG...light years apart in build quality and only a slight price difference.
One should have learned that anything negative said to Denco just gets thrown right back verbatim. It's all he knows how to do.You're the troll that keeps pushing the binocular they own even though it has fallen behind all the newer binoculars in FOV and transmission. You're not being fair to other forum members with your biased view of the EDG. Shame on you for promoting an outdated, discontinued binocular with a substandard FOV and low transmission to innocent forum members just because you are selling them. Maybe you should go to an EDG only forum, where everybody loves the EDG and there is no criticism of it. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion, and that is why they call it a forum. I tell it like it is, if you can disprove anything I said about the EDG do it. You don't like my criticism of the EDG because it might affect your sales.
But he could still open our posts as I just did with his #44.Can we request admin to put us on his ignore list?
That's OK. He'd still have to click to open them, probably a lot of them!But he could still open our posts as I just did with his #44.
I just found the ignore link, lol! The EDG 8x42 I purchased from you are the best pair of binoculars I have owned or handled. It is a remarkable optical apparatus.Folks, FYI you just have to ignore Dennis' noise here. The troll posts again & again and I've spoken privately with 7-8 members here on this website who have either purchased EDG from me, or asked me how to order them, and loved them immediately when they arrive. Some choosing to retire their various Swaros and Leicas from the rotation.
It's hard to think of another website where the same user keeps repetitively posting gibberish over & over. I've never seen it before. What a shame. BF is very dysfunctional website. Now back to 10 more posts from the troll......why did I even come in here??? soon you'll be asking the same thing......
whoa....I just discovered the "ignore" button - wonderful! The deranged rantings have disappeared from my screen forever - it works really well!
The MHG arrived today and I had fifteen minutes to play with it at noon, and then another 15 minutes this evening. This is the first time i touched a MHG regardless of configuration, and I must say it's exactly what I had expected after reading reviews from everywhere.I have a request, when you have MHG write a few words comparing it to EDG. I have MHG 8x42 and I am happy with it, but I am still thinking about buying EDG 7x42.
What am I supposed to do with someone who changes his mind about binoculars more often than he changes his underpants?You are forgetting FOV, on-axis sharpness and brightness? There is no doubt the MHG is superior in those areas.
Dennis, when will the Habicht 7x42 be on your list again?You are forgetting FOV....
You are trying to change the subject because you are wrong. Be a man and admit you are wrong.
So are you going to keep the 7x42 and 8x42? I like having both, the EDG/MHG would be a good combination, the light weight of the MHG good for longer carries.The MHG arrived today and I had fifteen minutes to play with it at noon, and then another 15 minutes this evening. This is the first time i touched a MHG regardless of configuration, and I must say it's exactly what I had expected after reading reviews from everywhere.
I find the brightness, contrast and colour rendition identical to the EDG 7x42 in daylight, in dusk and at night, most likely because my pupils won't dilate to match the 6 mm exit pupil of the EDG.
Thanks for describing your impressions. I currently have the Nikon 8x30 EII, 8x42 MHG, 7x50 SP and the first edition Action 7x35 with a 9.3 degree field (the same version as the Golden Ring).
You know, I wrote that selling the EDG 7X42 would be heresy. It's the greatest 7x42 ever made and there won't be another better in the future.So are you going to keep the 7x42 and 8x42? I like having both, the EDG/MHG would be a good combination, the light weight of the MHG good for longer carries.
I recently added a new 7x50 SP from the sale in Japan, wow, very impressiveBig heavy battleship of a binocular, IF and not well-suited to birding, but a magnificent specimen optically and mechanically. Absolute classic instrument for astronomy or marine use.....the sale at Kyoie is still going btw!