I bought the Opticron 8x42 version because the Norwegian website Kikkertspesialisten rated it as only a hairsbreadth under the top three. These were its scores (with the top-rated Zeiss FL in parenthesis):Some people say that porro cascades are well kept secret and that these glasses are close to top brands, how good both of these, 8x and 10x, really are? And which roof prism would be thier equal?
That's right; it happens a lot. Companies like Opticron just badge products they buy in from Japanese makers. The Opticron Traveller 6x32 and Leupold Katmai 6x32 share the same close similarity.So I guess you want to say that Opticron is essentialy Leupold in a diffrent package?
Someone on this board concluded that nearly all internal focus porros have smaller fov than the traditional kind.
Well since I have had these (8x42) model for a few days thought I would shed some light as to my thought's! First is fov, the stated 335ft @ 1000 yds. Very deceptive, acctually feels more like 380 to 390ft. Distortion not being measured probably outer 1/4 of field.
... then they would be top performers and could come pretty close to alpha bins. Too bad they hadn't. Maybe the 10x42 is another case in respect of FOV. Do Leupold still offer the porro cascades?If only they had a wider field ...
If only they had a wider field ... and better color correction (ED objective + LaK EP) they'd be perfect!
Do Leupold still offer the porro cascades?
But the steady hold with the extra magnification plus IS when needed is a big win. If only they had a wider field ... and better color correction (ED objective + LaK EP) they'd be perfect! Wait, didn't I just say that about the Cascades!
I take it then that the ED objectives don't quite control color fringing as much as you would like?