Thanks. What happened to the rule that first time an abbreviation is used it needs to be defined?
Niels
Thanks. What happened to the rule that first time an abbreviation is used it needs to be defined?
Definitely not Instrument landing System...!I could guess, but what is ILS in this context?
Niels
I notice that kind of omission in quite a few preprints...Thanks. What happened to the rule that first time an abbreviation is used it needs to be defined?
Niels
Unseen by me, but it ought to be found in: Durban Museum Novitates 8 (15): p. 240.Where is the OD of Erythropygia coryphoeus eurina Clancey, 1969?
No way to find the title of his work and number pagesUnseen by me, but it ought to be found in: Durban Museum Novitates 8 (15): p. 240 .
Good luck finding it.
Where is the OD of Erythropygia coryphoeus eurina Clancey, 1969?
Merci !Clancey PA. 1969. Miscellaneous taxonomic notes on African birds. XXVII. 4. An adjustment to the names of Erythropygia coryphaeus (Lesson) forms. Durban Museum Novitates, 8 (15): 240‐241.
Issue 15 is lacking in Sabinet, unfortunately.
Snippet view in Google Books: Durban Museum Novitates
And, note that the OD says: "Erythropygia coryphaeus eurina".Where is the OD of Erythropygia coryphoeus eurina Clancey, 1969?
YepAnd, note that the OD says: "Erythropygia coryphaeus eurina".
Snippet view in Google Books: Durban Museum Novitates
4. AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE NAMES OF ERYTHROPYGIA CORYPHAEUS (LESSON) FORMS
In the Ostrich, vol. xxx, 1, 1959, pp. 42-44, I reviewed the variation exhibited by the Karoo Scrub Robin Erythropygia coryphaeus (Lesson), and admitted three races as follows: E.c.coryphaeus (Lesson), 1831: Uitenhage, eastern Cape, E.c.abbotti Friedmann, 1932: Berseda, Great Namaqualand, South-West Africa, and E.c.cinerea Macdonald, 1952: 16 miles N. of Port Nolloth, north-western Cape. The recent receipt of a short series of freshly moulted (April-July, 1967 and 1968) specimens from the Port Elizabeth district of the eastern Cape, these exact topotypes of E.c.coryphaeus, indicates that race (b), E.c.abbotti, of my revision is actually the nominotypical subspecies, with the name abbotti a synonym. Freshly moulted examples from Port Elizabeth are not distinguishable from others in comparable dress from as far to the north-west as Pofadder, in Bushmanland, and Kuruman, in the northern Cape. The topotypical as opposed to the referred populations of abbotti may be subspecifically discrete on the basis of a paler and redder-brown mantle colour, but our South-West African material is too limited at the present time to pursue this matter.
In the meantime, a name is required for race (c), E.c.coryphaeus, of my revision, and I propose
Erythropygia coryphaeus eurina, subsp. nov.
Type: ♂, first winter. "Glen Lyon" Farm, Glen, Modder R., Orange Free State. Collected by R. R. Davidson, 9 June, 1960. In the collection of the Durban Museum. D.M.Reg. No. 3948.
Diagnosis: Differs from E.c.coryphaeus (the abbotti of my 1959 revision) in having the head-top, nape and hind neck warmer and browner, less grey, and mantle, scapulars and rump buffy Olive-Brown (pl. xl), not Brownish Olive (pl. xxx) with greyish overlay. Below, with white mesial throat streak more laterally constricted; breast less greyish, more suffused with Buffy Brown (pl. xl), and sides of body and flanks much redder (Tawny-Olive (pl. xxix), versus Avellaneous (pl. xl)).
Range: The lowlands of Lesotho, the western half of the Orange Free State, the south-western Transvaal, West Griqualand and the Asbestos Mts., and the north-eastern Cape. The influence of this is observable in samples from Kenhardt, in the north-central Cape, and from the extreme south-east of the species' range at Committees, Great Fish R., eastern Cape.
...but the description makes no reference whatsoever to the bird's bill (or nose), and I'm struggling to reconcile this with a derivation from ῥις.eurina
Gr. ευ eu fine, good; ῥις rhis, ῥινος rhinos nose.
According to my Greek dictionary, ευρινος does indeed mean "with a fine nose", although I like your alternative!
I am confused about the avibase comment. The WGAC checklist is not on Avibase, and while they are posting updates to other checklists, they are the same ones being posted by IOC or Clements. So I don't think there is any sort of extra special clarification Avibase provides.I’m a bit perplexed regarding current treatment of Muscicapa flycatchers and allies.
Multiple studies have shown generic reshuffling to be necessary, as implemented by eBird/Clements some years back. For some reason, IOC has yet to act.
Adding to the conundrum, WGAC claims to have gone through Muscicapidae and on Avibase (which seems to be up to date om WGAC decisions) at least Böhm’s, Sooty and Usher’s have been moved out of Muscicapa. However, Tessman’s, Olivaceous and Ashy remain in Muscicapa, which doesn’t make sense genetically (eBird/Clements place them in Fraseria).
A mess, to say the least. Anyone has any insight here?
The checklist isn't per se, but the WGAC position is noted under each species.I am confused about the avibase comment. The WGAC checklist is not on Avibase, and while they are posting updates to other checklists, they are the same ones being posted by IOC or Clements. So I don't think there is any sort of extra special clarification Avibase provides.
Current proposals seem to be aimed at resolving differences in what species are recognized. I haven't seen as much effort so far placed on resolving conflict in genera. That might be further off. I asked the IOC folks some times back about the Charadrius issue, and there reply was that they didn't want to make those revisions while the update process was going on. Might be something similar going on with Muscicapidae.
Guess we’ll just have to wait and see! 🙂The WGAC status may simply reflect the IOC status at the moment in some cases, as IOC provided the baseline list that the WGAC is using as a starting point. It may or may not have significance for the final list. I'm not sure, as I noted above, that they are tackling higher level taxonomy at the moment, including reconciling differences in genera.
Although if this is being kept up to date with WGAC decisions, it's got some interesting information. I note that Scarlet Flycatcher and Franklin's Grouse are not recognized by the WGAC (The former still recognized by IOC), but Myrtle Warbler, American Barn Owl, and Mangrove Warbler are. All three of those species belong to lists which WGAC has allegedly completed review on. Although all of those might be waiting for NACC proposals before reflecting any actual changes. For instance Lemon-rumped Tanager is still recognized by WGAC, despite a proposal to lump it recently added to the IOC page, and I think it has already been voted down by SACC.