To tell the truth, It’s the following extract that interests me.I think "the Bornean C. ruficauda population" are now C. ruficrissa, and C. ruficauda is no longer "found outside the Philippine archipelago".
(The split doesn't seem to have been based on genetic data, however.)
I believe this is the only study that mentions Vauriella albigularis"but were related to Philippine endemics Vauriella (Rhinomyias/Cyornis) albigularis"
They obtained a single sequence, which is in GenBank, but is labelled "Cyornis sp." there -- Cyornis sp. PeH-2019a voucher KU:15317 cytochrome b (cytb) gene, compl - Nucleotide - NCBII believe this is the only study that mentions Vauriella albigularis
albigularis sounds and acts IMO like a CyornisThey obtained a single sequence, which is in GenBank, but is labelled "Cyornis sp." there -- Cyornis sp. PeH-2019a voucher KU:15317 cytochrome b (cytb) gene, compl - Nucleotide - NCBI
How were they able to identify it as albigularis ?They obtained a single sequence, which is in GenBank, but is labelled "Cyornis sp." there -- Cyornis sp. PeH-2019a voucher KU:15317 cytochrome b (cytb) gene, compl - Nucleotide - NCBI
The voucher associated to the sequence ("KU 15317") is listed as "Vauriella (Rhinomyias/Cyornis) albigularis" in the suppl. mat. of the study -- maybe they initially ID'd is as such, and doubt arose after the publication of the paper, for some reason...? I can't tell for sure.How were they able to identify it as albigularis ?
Moreover, it is not excluded that Vauriella goodfellowi is a Muscicapaalbigularis sounds and acts IMO like a Cyornis
It is listed as being collected on Panay, so there is a very limited number of confusion species, none at all likely.The voucher associated to the sequence ("KU 15317") is listed as "Vauriella (Rhinomyias/Cyornis) albigularis" in the suppl. mat. of the study -- maybe they initially ID'd is as such, and doubt arose after the publication of the paper, for some reason...? I can't tell for sure.
(It might conceivably be trivial, I guess -- e.g., a consequence of no Cyornis albigularis being recognized in the NCBI taxonomy. But, without a clear explanation, I'd treat the ID of this bird with a bit of caution.)
IIRC (I don't have the book with me just now) Delacour and Mayr lumped goodfellowi, albigularis and insignis as one speciesMoreover, it is not excluded that Vauriella goodfellowi is a Muscicapa
IIRC (I don't have the book with me just now) Delacour and Mayr lumped goodfellowi, albigularis and insignis as one species
Thanks. I only recalled a part of it correctly then The Philippine avifauna has yet to fully recover from the lumping bonanza of the 20th century.Delacour & Mayr 1946 (Birds of the Philippines) lumped goodfellowi and insignis, calling them "Two very distinct races" of Rhinomyias insignis. (They made albigularis a ssp of Rhinomyias ruficauda.)
Here (warning : large file).
Sounds very interesting!Kritika M. Garg, Chyi Yin Gwee, Balaji Chattopadhyay, Nathaniel S. Ng, Dewi M. Prawiradilaga, Gabriel David, Jérôme Fuchs, Hung Le Manh, Jonathan Martinez, Urban Olsson, Vuong Tan Tu, Sophea Chhin, Per Alström, Fumin Lei, Frank E. Rheindt (2023). When colors mislead: genomics and bioacoustics prompt re-classification of Asian flycatcher radiation (Aves: Niltavinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2023, 107999.
Abstract
Traditional classification of many animals, including birds, has been highly dependent on external morphological characters like plumage coloration. However, both bioacoustics and genetic or genomic data have revolutionized our understanding of the relationships of certain lineages and led to sweeping taxonomic re-organizations. In this study, we present a case of erroneous delimitation of genus boundaries in the species-rich flycatcher subfamily Niltavinae. Genera within this subfamily have historically been delineated based on blue versus brown male body plumage until recent studies based on a few mitochondrial and nuclear loci unearthed several cases of generic misclassification. Here we use extensive bioacoustic data from 43 species and genomic data from 28 species for a fundamental reclassification of species in the Niltavinae. Our study reveals that song is an important trait to classify these birds even at the genus level, whereas plumage traits exhibit ample convergence and have led to numerous historic misattributions. Our taxonomic re-organization leads to new biogeographic limits of major genera, such that the genus Cyornis now only extends as far east as the islands of Sulawesi, Sula, and Banggai, whereas Eumyias is redefined to extend far beyond Wallace’s Line to the islands of Seram and Timor. Our conclusions advise against an over-reliance on morphological traits and underscore the importance of integrative datasets.
same here!Sounds very interesting!
Would love a copy if anyone has access?