MJB
Well-known member
Tz10
I find that the 20-50 times eyepiece zoom on the Swarovski up to about 45 times is OK with the TZ10 at low camera zoom. (The camera lens barrel is held gently by the extended rubber eyepiece surround.) Conversely, at low scope zoom, you can use a higher TZ10 zoom, the results in both cases being very detailed. Just because the TZ10 has a 12 times zoom doesn't mean you have to use max zoom! At low light levels, the second approach offers better contrast. I'm practising by focussing on small buds on twigs about 20 metres away, and with practice, hand-held gives remarkable results; if I take 3 pictures quickly, one or perhaps two are very sharp. Viewing the higher-exposure results on-screen allows a good degree of enlargement before pixelation interferes. I hope that helps!
MJB
MJB I have an old Canon which I am considering changing. I originally was looking at the Lx3/5 but am intigued with the TZ10 which offers the option of a good distance/travel camera as well. The purist would say you cant use this camera because of the 12x zoom. How do you overcome this, could this be fitted to an adaptor or is hand holding the best bet.
I find that the 20-50 times eyepiece zoom on the Swarovski up to about 45 times is OK with the TZ10 at low camera zoom. (The camera lens barrel is held gently by the extended rubber eyepiece surround.) Conversely, at low scope zoom, you can use a higher TZ10 zoom, the results in both cases being very detailed. Just because the TZ10 has a 12 times zoom doesn't mean you have to use max zoom! At low light levels, the second approach offers better contrast. I'm practising by focussing on small buds on twigs about 20 metres away, and with practice, hand-held gives remarkable results; if I take 3 pictures quickly, one or perhaps two are very sharp. Viewing the higher-exposure results on-screen allows a good degree of enlargement before pixelation interferes. I hope that helps!
MJB