Hi Bob,
That should work out too but won't it make your EL 8x32 more bulky and inconvenient to carry around?
My UTA stays on a Slik Tripod all the time for when I need it, which isn't all that often in my case.
As usual, the perfect solution is the one that fits your needs, exactly
As my application differs a bit from yours, I like the idea of the adapter staying on the binoculars: Most of the time, I'm using my spotting scope with the tripod, and the binoculars hand-held. If then a situation arises where a wide field of view is advantageous, I can just exchange optics as they're both on quick release plates.
To me, the flexbility gained for just a tiny bit of of extra bulk is a worthwhile trade-off, but of course, that's really because it meets my needs.
Putting the extra bulk into context: The complete rig is higher than the bare binoculars by basically one thumb width plus one adapter plate height. The horizontal footprint is unchanged, as the adapter with the plate is much narrower and shorter than the binoculars. That means it comes down to having a slightly higher pair of binoculars than before.
If you carry it around the neck, you probably won't notice much of a difference unless you're squeezing through narrow hide doors, trekking through dense underbrush, or moving around in some other kind of confined environment.
The binoculars will certainly be less pocketable, and if you like to protect them from the rain by carrying them under the jacket, that will be less convenient too. If you have a carrying case specific to the binoculars, they most likely won't fit into that at all.
Personally, I like to go birding by bicycle, and carry both my camera and the binoculars in a handlebar bag with quick release and shoulder strap. It basically is a camera bag with velcro-configurable compartments, so I can just set it up to accommodate the extra height of the binoculars.
Your question regarding the extra bulk was quite inspiring: I believe that by dropping the "requirement" for holding the binoculars with the thumb directly beneath the barrel, a much slimmer adapter would be possible. Guess I'll have to create another variant!
Regards,
Henning