I'll say it again: it's mind boggling that binocular manufacturers don't offer various eyecup options, especially when the eyecups are removable/replaceable by design! Just like how in-ear headphones have multiple rubber tips to accommodate different ear anatomy, it would be trivial to offer an "extra long" or "extra wide" option for consumers who don't like the size/shape of the stock eyecups.
In the case of the CL-B, it's not just a "too small" problem like with the Meostar 32mm; rather, in addition to being needlessly narrow (they eyecups are narrower than the barrel!) the material and shape of the eyecup itself is not comfortable against the skin. The rubber has this oddly hard, "tacky" feel that I found unpleasant. Overall, I found the CL-B to be an ergonomic nightmare, from the "too close to the eyes" focus knob position, to the insane diopter mechanism, to the excessively (for me) slender barrels with the awkward FP bulges. The awkward hold negated the light weight and I found them more fatiguing to use than slightly heavier 32mm binoculars as a consequence. I definitely prefer the "short and chunky" body style.... I know some find the CL-B to be ergonomically lovely, so YMMV.
And, while they are very light, they are not small -- you can see in the photo below they are nearly as long as the "chunky mid sized" 32mm class like Conquest HD or Kowa Genesis, and quite a big longer than the Ultravid 32mm. So they aren't particularly compact, pity they didn't preserve the dimensions of the 1st gen CL. For my tastes, a used Ultravid 32mm is a better option at similar (or cheaper) cost. Or if you really want a "mini alpha" that is take-anywhere small, get the Zeiss VP 8x25 which at least folds for stowage.
View attachment 1515478
It's too bad, as the view of the CL-B is phenomenal, other than the pedestrian (but still plenty adequate) FOV; nearly perfectly corrected to the edge, superb color fidelity and brightness... the view was so good that I really tried to find a way to like them.