Absolutely. The Zeiss 8x25 have a wonderfully sharp clear bright view against the sky. I'm amazed. On the other hand, due to the small exit pupil they are finicky to use, and they are mechanically fragile; I would not recommend them for anyone who does not have a sedentary lifestyle, and do not plan to take them outside the city in the future.Really exactly as you say, the binoculars with the larger exit pupil will have ease eye placement. And yes indded, in low light it doesn't really compensate few percent better light transmission in front of 5mm bigger aperture...
But I want to draw attention to something else. During the day, only on enough light, the binocular with higher transmission will be brighter, when the pupils of our eyes will close anyway below the exit pupils diameter of both binoculars. Maybe someone would say that: "on sunny days you don't need a high transmission binoculars because there is enough light anyway". But it is false because a binoculars with better light transmission will have more information in shady areas on sunny days than one with less transmission, even if it has a 5mm advantage at aperture. The Zeiss 8x25 has a light transmission at least 5% higher than the Nikon M7 8x30. For example, a bird on the bright sky will appear through Nikon in two or three shades of gray, and through Zeiss in a larger palette with greater dynamics of colors in shaded areas. So Zeiss has a big brightness advantage on sunny days and Nikon only a small advantage at night (I say "only" because at night the opening matters the most, but the transmission also has its contribution). But anyway, these binoculars will be used more during the day time
Edmund