Which one is this then?I believe ID is straight forward, and the newly split booby doesn't occur in the Atlantic.
The proposal mentions that range expansion in the Pacific has occurred, with both Brown and "Brewster's" being found in the same colonies to a limited extent, and one of the arguments is that when mixed the boobies mostly don't breed with each other, if I am remembering correctly.
The second one is definitely an Atlantic, not a Cocos/Brewster's. Juvenile Booby id is far out of my area of expertise and I am at work without the resources to checkWhich one is this then?
![]()
Birdwatchers flock for Redcar rare brown booby's visit
The nearest breeding colonies of the brown booby are in the Caribbean and off the African coast.www.bbc.com
There were two Brown Booby's in the UK last year (at least) and at one point, the one on the Scilly Isles was sharing it's rock with a Red-footed Booby.
![]()
Hundreds flock to Isles of Scilly for rare seabird
The red-footed booby has created much excitement in the bird-watching community.www.bbc.com
Unless you can specifically ID a bird to race, strict listers will not usually count it and on their lists, it will appear as Brown Booby 'sp'. With their eccentric, pelagic wanderings, how do you know it couldn't turn up.
IIRC each island has there own endemic resident subspecies, which are also future splits. The challenge IIRC is that some mainland birds do sometimes pop up in the West Indies, although I assume they must be identifiable for this to be known. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.2024-B-13: Revise the taxonomy of the Sharp-shinned Hawk complex: Split mainland Accipiter velox from Caribbean A. striatus
'Caribbean', do they move because Scythebill gives Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Rep) as the range? If they do move around, could both occur in Central America and how the heck would you ID them?
Why not, they have a Caribbean coastline?IIRC each island has there own endemic resident subspecies, which are also future splits. The challenge IIRC is that some mainland birds do sometimes pop up in the West Indies, although I assume they must be identifiable for this to be known. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.
I would imagine that a vagrant Caribbean bird could show up in Florida, but outside of that odd event any bird seen on the mainland is almost certainly the "regular" Sharp-shinned Hawk. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.
Could be satellite tracked or ringing returns, so not necessarily!IIRC each island has there own endemic resident subspecies, which are also future splits. The challenge IIRC is that some mainland birds do sometimes pop up in the West Indies, although I assume they must be identifiable for this to be known. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.
I would imagine that a vagrant Caribbean bird could show up in Florida, but outside of that odd event any bird seen on the mainland is almost certainly the "regular" Sharp-shinned Hawk. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.
So where in the Pacific does one see one species, or the other, or both?I believe ID is straight forward, and the newly split booby doesn't occur in the Atlantic.
The proposal mentions that range expansion in the Pacific has occurred, with both Brown and "Brewster's" being found in the same colonies to a limited extent, and one of the arguments is that when mixed the boobies mostly don't breed with each other, if I am remembering correctly.
The subspecies to be split as Caribean are those on Cuba, Hispaniola and Puerto Rico.Why not, they have a Caribbean coastline?
As I said, range is given as only Hispaniola but they refer to it as Caribbean so they must wander or they'd call it 'Hispaniolan'?
What you describe is three races, not just the one, mentioned above which makes more sense but the info there is obviously incomplete.The subspecies to be split as Caribean are those on Cuba, Hispaniola and Puerto Rico.
Source: Catanach T et al. 2021.
The recent SACC proposal neatly summarised everything:So where in the Pacific does one see one species, or the other, or both?
The fact that "Tropical Eastern Pacific Booby" is a proposed common name gives me a strong sense of dread.The recent SACC proposal neatly summarised everything:
T.a. clarus is typically considered the subspecies found on Trinidad. (eBird includes this as part of the range of clarus; IOC omits it.)albicans Isn' on Trinidad according to IOC so what is?
I've just been through all the races on Scythebill and Trinidad, doesn't get a mantion?
The Caribbean subspecies (I've only seen Hispaniolan - the Puerto Rican one is critically endangered, and I haven't been to Cuba yet) are very distinctive, with obvious rufous or buffy faces.IIRC each island has there own endemic resident subspecies, which are also future splits. The challenge IIRC is that some mainland birds do sometimes pop up in the West Indies, although I assume they must be identifiable for this to be known. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.
I would imagine that a vagrant Caribbean bird could show up in Florida, but outside of that odd event any bird seen on the mainland is almost certainly the "regular" Sharp-shinned Hawk. At any rate, I wouldn't expect the Caribbean form to ever appear in Central America.
I wonder if you'd pick it if one of these turned up?The Caribbean subspecies (I've only seen Hispaniolan - the Puerto Rican one is critically endangered, and I haven't been to Cuba yet) are very distinctive, with obvious rufous or buffy faces.
Check it out - this is a really distinctive bird:
![]()
Hispaniolan Sharp-shinned Hawk (Subspecies Accipiter striatus striatus)
Hispaniolan Sharp-shinned Hawk from Duverge, Dominican Republic on March 11, 2018 at 05:24 PM by Adam Winerwww.inaturalist.org
Aside from the mind-boggling odds against finding a Eurasian Sparrowhawk in the extremely limited range of these (there's still no records in the Americas, and if we ever get one it's much more likely to be in the Lesser Antilles than the Greater), I think the typical yellow eye would be a dead giveaway.I wonder if you'd pick it if one of these turned up?
![]()
Eurasian Sparrowhawk - Accipiter nisus
Eurasian Sparrowhawk - Accipiter nisus male, identification. picture by Jules Fouarge. Ref:jufo137058www.oiseaux.net
I recall that Eurasian Sparrowhawk has been recorded in the Americas, albeit in Alaska rather than the Caribbean.Aside from the mind-boggling odds against finding a Eurasian Sparrowhawk in the extremely limited range of these (there's still no records in the Americas, and if we ever get one it's much more likely to be in the Lesser Antilles than the Greater), I think the typical yellow eye would be a dead giveaway.
That's never been a serious contender. IIRC the NACC is going for Cocos Booby, which complements the existing Nazca Booby; both are named after the geologic plates that correspond to their range.The fact that "Tropical Eastern Pacific Booby" is a proposed common name gives me a strong sense of dread.
I want to say out near Hawaii they have found some mixed in with the Tropical Pacific form (which should probably eventually be split from the Atlantic form eventually).So where in the Pacific does one see one species, or the other, or both?
You know I wasn't serious right?Aside from the mind-boggling odds against finding a Eurasian Sparrowhawk in the extremely limited range of these (there's still no records in the Americas, and if we ever get one it's much more likely to be in the Lesser Antilles than the Greater), I think the typical yellow eye would be a dead giveaway.