Jim Mountjoy
Active member
I have not seen much commentary about this version in these pages. I suspect that this is because they are not big sellers, but is this because of an assumption that this is a poor combination of magnification and objective size, or actual issues with this version's performance?
The reason for my interest is that we are shopping for an upgrade for my wife. She has had limited chances to look through Swarovskis in person, and although she has been generally impressed her reaction to a pair of 10X42s included some concern about weight, which is an issue for her generally, However, she has also expressed some frustration with 8X magnification. So, I am thinking that 32s might be best for her, but wondering if Swarovski's high transmission really makes a 10X32 combination a reasonable choice?
The reason for my interest is that we are shopping for an upgrade for my wife. She has had limited chances to look through Swarovskis in person, and although she has been generally impressed her reaction to a pair of 10X42s included some concern about weight, which is an issue for her generally, However, she has also expressed some frustration with 8X magnification. So, I am thinking that 32s might be best for her, but wondering if Swarovski's high transmission really makes a 10X32 combination a reasonable choice?