The darker side of listing (1 Viewer)

[Johann Sebastian Bach]

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Your previous post seemed a bit narked: "for the umpteenth time".
I've enjoyed BF for a few years now but have never come across either your shooting discussion ban (with which I agree), nor have I come across the guy whose posts you deleted.
I therefore felt that I'd been shouted at by the teacher who'd not yet told me what the rules were. You don't advertise these anywhere, do you?

Peter

 

[Steve Babbs]

All I can say is I can only hope that these pathetic wind up attempts and deliberate attempts to try and bring up the dreaded 's' word that I usually get blamed for doing no doubt in an attempt to get me banned by complaining to the mods as soon as I fall for it and reply are met with the same blunt warnings from the Mods that my comments are!


And just for the record going back to the actual topic of tresspassing well I'm not claiming to be an angel by any stretch of the imagination,though it would worryingly seem I'm a lot closer to it than many, like i said before its not so much people doing these relatively minor things now and again kind of knowing its wrong but maybe worth the risk that I object too,what i find rather hard to grasp though is people coming on here bragging about doing it and encouraging others to do it as though we have the god given right to do what we like reguardless of wether the law says otherwise.

Not sure if you fancy a career change but writing for the Daily Mail would appear to be a good option.

 

[Steve]

I therefore felt that I'd been shouted at by the teacher who'd not yet told me what the rules were. You don't advertise these anywhere, do you?

Peter

Rule 7b please don't discuss shooting of birds on the bird forum.

Better?

 

[Johann Sebastian Bach]

Rule 7b please don't discuss shooting of birds on the bird forum.

Better?

Thank you, Steve. The other 6 rules (and 7a) are.............?

Peter

 

[Steve]

http://www.birdforum.net/help/Policy

First paragraph I think covers it.

Too busy to continue this discussion, be good in the playground Im off to the staffroom

 

[Johann Sebastian Bach]

http://www.birdforum.net/help/Policy

First paragraph I think covers it.

Too busy to continue this discussion, be good in the playground Im off to the staffroom

Gosh, the teacher's here are just as Lord Acton said theyd be.

Peter

 

[Bowland Birders]

What's the story with the tripod??

a

It was a long time ago

 

[Si Clayton]

Thanks for the appropriate moderation here Steve, I don't envy you! There are some sad attitudes on this thread aren't there.
Wishing I hadn't joined this thread now, I'm off to do some habitat management for a red-listed species on private property, hope nobody has been trespassing and disturbing a critically endangered species for treasure hunting purposes. It's voluntary, and more fun and rewarding than listing.
If you want to see them, contact me privately to arrange a viewing, but they have already been disturbed sufficiently to be very very rare. No I'm not telling.

Someone should address MJB's very intelligent questions, if you don't like the law, do something about it in the appropriate forum.

 

[MJB]

Not sure if you fancy a career change but writing for the Daily Mail would appear to be a good option.

Steve,
Forgive me if I've got things entirely wrong, but based on your previous posts, the above sounds rather as if you've realised your point of view is less tenable than you thought, and so you've applied a diversionary tactic in the shape of disparagement? I must admit I all too often have done the same thing...:h?:
MJB
PS I remember when the Daily Mail employed journalists who checked their facts before compiling a story. See Ben Goldacre's website, Bad Science for archived examples of the Daily Mail's take on such things as MMR, dieticians and the like

 

[Steve Babbs]

Steve,
Forgive me if I've got things entirely wrong, but based on your previous posts, the above sounds rather as if you've realised your point of view is less tenable than you thought, and so you've applied a diversionary tactic in the shape of disparagement? I must admit I all too often have done the same thing...:h?:
MJB
PS I remember when the Daily Mail employed journalists who checked their facts before compiling a story. See Ben Goldacre's website, Bad Science for archived examples of the Daily Mail's take on such things as MMR, dieticians and the like

You've got things entirely wrong.

 

[MJB]

You've got things entirely wrong.

Fine. So why the disparagement?
MJB

 

[angusmcoatup]

Watching a load of noisy blokes chivvy a knackered and freshly ringed Raddes Warbler seawards at Spurn 20 or so years ago was dark enough to put me off collective birding jamborees for a good while. Until that point I thought all birders actually liked birds.

Never seen the point in flushing myself as it usually ends in a fleeting glimpse of a feathery a*se as it shoots over the horizon. (Apologies for use of the naughty S word)

 

[birdboybowley]

Why is it when I picture Steve I only see the teacher from the Inbetweeners...??? Anyone else?

 

[Steve Babbs]

Why is it when I picture Steve I only see the teacher from the Inbetweeners...??? Anyone else?

He's older than me! Well he's got more grey hair anyway. And I'm only 6ft 1, so I'm a short-arse in comparison.

 

[birdboybowley]

He's older than me! Well he's got more grey hair anyway. And I'm only 6ft 1, so I'm a short-arse in comparison.

Nah, not you Steve, the other Steve!!

 

[Steve Babbs]

Nah, not you Steve, the other Steve!!

Ah I see what you mean.

 

[Steve Babbs]

I suspect this was meant as a light-hearted thread. From now on I'm going to only post in that spirit.B

 

[Jan-Paul Charteris]

Why is it when I picture Steve I only see the teacher from the Inbetweeners...??? Anyone else?

You aint alone there

 

[Steve]

Which Steve?

 

[birdboybowley]

You! :-O