Matt Prince
Sharkbait
Oh dear with botha those comments, I 'm shore the lark jokes been dunn to death now.
Oh dear with botha those comments, I 'm shore the lark jokes been dunn to death now.
... or were you just alauding to it being fun??!!
John Boyd is doing a good job, for sure. It's great to have someone rapidly prototyping (and sharing) the potential taxonomic implications of every new study.Boyd's TiF is the freshest checklist without a doubt.
Zuccon & Ericson 2010. A multi-gene phylogeny disentangles the chat-flycatcher complex (Aves: Muscicapidae). Zoologica scripta.Fascinating study by Zuccon & Ericson. I am not surprised that there is something going on with these Rhinomyias flycatchers.
Sangster, Alström, Forsmark & Olsson 2010. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis of Old World chats and flycatchers reveals extensive paraphyly at family, subfamily and genus level (Aves: Muscicapidae). Mol Phyl Evol: in press.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...serid=10&md5=56f7997313051141b7cc8c63dd884e10
This could result in quite a re-shuffle – John Boyd will be very busy!
Richard
Unfortunately: "The position of C. concretus within Clade D1 [Niltavinae] could not be resolved."It is obvious that Cyornis concretus is something else, but no name change is proposed. What would apply to that taxon?
H&M 3 Corrigenda 8 (2008) corrected the name Hodgsonius phaenicuroides to H phoenicuroides, citing Dickinson & Walters 2006 (SNAB 53):
http://www.repository.naturalis.nl/document/41775 [p153]
Phoenicuroides is used by Zoonomen and OBC; but not by Sangster et al 2010, IOC, BLI, or Cornell/Clements.
Comments...?
Richard
Hmm, well spotted, Laurent.But it also has a completely indisputable "ae" in the main text on p. 70 (which D&W did not check?).